Disclosures

Terms & Project Disclosures

This page clarifies what the public case studies & project descriptions on this site represent, and what they intentionally exclude. It's not a substitute for a formal MSA or NDA, but sets transparent expectations for prospective collaboration.

Summary

All showcased builds are internal experiments, reconstructed examples, or independently created side projects. They avoid exposure of any client's proprietary code, data, prompts, model weights, infrastructure specifics, or strategic trade secrets. Similar domains (e.g. document processing, real estate, partner ecosystems) reflect generalized architecture patterns - not production replicas.

Independently Built Examples

Featured projects and case studies are internal builds, prototypes, or reconstructed examples created on personal time. They are not direct exports of client repositories or private assets.

No Proprietary Code or Data

Client-confidential code, datasets, prompts, model configurations, or infrastructure details are never copied into public artifacts. When a similar domain is shown (e.g. real estate, document processing) it is a fresh implementation or simplified abstraction.

Reconstruction Over Reuse

If a concept originated in client work (e.g. an orchestration pattern), any public version is rebuilt from scratch with generic naming and no sensitive business logic or schema coupling.

Data Sources

Demonstrations use synthetic, open, or anonymized data. No production credentials, PII, or regulated data appear in examples.

AI & Evaluation Transparency

Where AI features are described, claims refer to internal benchmarks or qualitative outcomes from controlled test sets - not unverifiable marketing metrics.

Attribution & Licensing

Third‑party libraries retain their original licenses. Any original diagrams, copy, or code in public repos remain © Edwin Genego unless otherwise noted.

Prospective Engagements

On request, deeper architectural walk‑throughs can be done under mutual NDA with domain‑specific redactions preserved.

Ideation & IP Boundaries

Solution ideas, architectural motifs, and workflow concepts referenced publicly or during early exploratory calls stem from internal R&D, prior generalized experience, or fresh brainstorming. They exclude client‑specific trade secrets. No assignment or exclusivity is granted until a written agreement is executed; likewise prospective clients retain ownership of their pre‑existing IP and confidential business context shared under NDA.

Usage & Interpretation Notes

  • Nothing on the site grants reuse rights for proprietary deployment in your product without an explicit agreement.
  • Security, compliance, or tenant‑isolation specifics are intentionally omitted from public diagrams.
  • Performance numbers are directional when ranges are given; exact traces/logs are only shared privately.

Requesting Additional Detail

If you need a deeper exploration of architecture, failure-path handling, evaluation harnesses, or scaling considerations for a similar build, I'm happy to walk through patterns under an NDA. Public assets intentionally omit: production environment topology, credential flows, tenant isolation mechanics, full schema diagrams, and private evaluation datasets.

Ideation, Brainstorming & IP Boundaries

Most architectural ideas, agent strategies, retrieval layering approaches, or evaluation concepts referenced on intro calls originate from prior independent R&D, generalized engineering practice, or real-time collaborative brainstorming. They are intentionally high‑level and non‑exclusive until a written engagement defines scope, ownership, or licensing. Below is how I keep boundaries clean:

  • Many patterns (agent orchestration, retrieval layering, evaluation harness design) emerged from independent experimentation & internal sandbox prototypes.
  • Early call brainstorming is non-exclusive ideation - it does not transfer ownership of generic engineering concepts to either party without a contract.
  • If a prospective client already pursues a similar direction, their pre-existing strategic framing remains theirs; overlap is treated as convergent evolution, not derivation.
  • Upon formal engagement, custom code, schemas, and domain‑specific refinements produced for you are owned or licensed per the engagement agreement.
  • I actively avoid ingesting confidential artifacts into generic reusable libraries to prevent commingling of proprietary logic.
  • Where similarity risk exists (e.g. two parties in adjacent verticals), isolation and naming segregation practices are followed once retained.

Need a formal addendum (NDA / IP clause) ahead of deeper exploration? Happy to execute a mutual version before exchanging proprietary architecture documents, datasets, or production metrics.